Google Doesn’t Have Notion of Toxic Links

Date:

Share post:

by Clint ButlerDigitaleer

(SEO This Week) – Google’s John Mueller posted on Twitter yesterday that Google doesn’t have a “notion of toxic links.”

The whole thread is really about the use of certain tools to help SEO’s asses the value of backlinks pointed at their websites. The tools have been using the term “toxic” to identify the worst links in a link profile.

Those tools rate them based on manual scoring patterns their users have input into their system. They use these patterns to help automate the checking. Thus, some links are great, some are ok, and some are “toxic”.

Here, the original poster asked about some links the tools told him were toxic and what he should do about them.

John’s reply was interesting.

John isn’t telling the poster to not disavow, John is saying that the “grade” of “toxic” doesn’t correlate to the same way that Google “grades” links. Then he goes on to recommend that the OP disavow the links if he feels they are bad.

The thing is, other sites are saying that John is telling people to “ignore toxic links“, which isn’t at all what John said. He said Google doesn’t “have a notion of “toxic” links”.

But Google does have systems in place, rudimentary as they are, to assess the quality of links. Moreso, their website assessment tools seem to be looking at the quality of a website, then assessing how much value a link from that site has.

If it’s a good quality site that scores high in Google’s eyes, the link is more valuable.
If it’s a poor quality site that lets everyone post links, the link has less, no, or negative value.

John knows this, however, rather than saying that the OP should ignore “toxic” links, he should have advised the OP to manually assess each link because Google’s systems may or may not be grading on a similar curve as the tools. Thus link tools might think a link is bad based on user patterns, but that same link might not be bad in Google’s eyes (or vice versa).

This thread, and the misinterpretation by others, is how bad SEO information is spread across the web and why it’s important for you to analyze and test the information you are taking in for yourself.

Clint Butler
Clint Butlerhttps://www.seothisweek.com
With more than 15+ years’ of Agency Owner experience working as an advanced SEO, I help companies scale their business with the best content strategies and digital marketing campaigns.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

spot_img

Related articles

Google Fixes Exploit Allowing Unauthorized Map Pin Moves for Businesses

Google has reportedly addressed a critical vulnerability in its Maps platform that allowed unaffiliated users to move business...

Google Testing New Rich Snippet: ‘Places People Are Talking About’ in Local Search

In its constant evolution to enhance user experience, Google is testing a new feature within its search results...

Google Testing AI-Generated Content in ‘Things to Know’: Transparency Questions Arise

In a quiet but significant development, Google has begun testing AI-generated content in its “Things to Know” section...

Mastering Bing SEO: Unlocking a New Dimension in Search Optimization

Google has been the dominant force in the search engine world for years. Yet, Bing has steadily carved...